James Mayes

Transparency vs protectionism, part 2: Driving up quality

In Facebook, LinkedIn, Recruitment, Social Media, Twitter, Uncategorized on September 20, 2010 at 8:46 am

So last week I wrote a post about the transparent nature of Social Media. It presents a clear challenge to all businesses, but particularly those in the past who have a more secretive nature to their operations.  There were a number of great comments on that post and those (plus a discussion with a contemporary across the pond) caused me to extend the thinking.

What if the transparent nature of social media was driven out as a message to candidates? Not for the purposes of securing a new job, or learning more about a client – but at a more conceptual level.  If a company or agency recruits via Social Media, they will at some point have discussed transparency.  It therefore stands to reason that these organisations are more comfortable that one of the following applies:

  1. They don’t have anything to hide
  2. They might have things they aren’t proud of, but they’re happy to be called out on it and learn from those mistakes
  3. They accept things will go wrong, but figure the benefits outweigh the risks

Whichever way you look at it, Social Media should allow for better scrutiny, commentary and feedback.  It should drive up the quality of the recruitment experience.

So here’s the question:  Can we drive this transparent message to candidates?  Will they buy this concept? If they do, we’ll see more candidates leaning towards those employers / agencies that are active in the social space. Those hiding in the more traditional media may find it harder and harder to generate great candidates – will this prove to be game-changing in the quality standards applicable across the industry?

I don’t have the answers yet – but I’ve got a strong gut feel and I’d love to hear your thoughts!

DISCLOSURE: I’m a founding director of TweetJobs. Our business focusses on helping recruiters to get Social. I clearly have a vested interest in this topic, though would note this is my personal blog. I feel free to speculate and theorise here, but flame away if you feel this disclosure is insufficient!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: